This is an important issue: a company that owns mobile networks wants to install repeaters antennas (Base transceiver station) on the rooftops of the Olympic village. In Exchange for money. Requests are sent to administrators of condo and approved or rejected by the Assembly. The point is: based on what make the decision? We are in possession of sufficient information to assess the risks to health of the inhabitants exposed to radio frequencies? Official positions of Governments and medical institutions (who) minimize the dangers to health, but did not exclude them for a better specified by "particularly" sensitive population. It's probably a premature conclusion to trust on the implications of prolonged exposure to electromagnetic fields generated by the recent massive use of wireless electronic devices. And meanwhile the decision is: how much risk I run to get more or less severely because of the fields generated by antennas and mobile telephones? This question follows another: what level of democracy there is a choice made independently by a group of people, which affects the lives of others, but did not compete that year to the decision, if, for example, a condo allows the roof to a telephone company to install an antenna that will invest in emissions the adjacent condo that did not participate in the decision? The issue looks at that time years about damage from active and passive smoking ... And then it's worth talking about, without prejudice, to exercise their right to determine together the quality of our lives and our children ...
Some links to documentation on the subject, a first partial summary:
Technical information 1
Technical information 2
Switzerland League against cancer 1
Cancer League Switzerland 2
OMS 2006
Il Sole 24 Ore
The Republic
Printing
Humans are allergic
Appeal of Freiburg
Regulatory assessment
No comments:
Post a Comment